
A gradual pace of rate increases would cause less disruption to the economy and financial system, Cleveland Federal Reserve President Beth Hammack said on Thursday, according to Reuters.
"Monetary policy needs to move to a restrictive stance."
"Gradual rate-hike path is the best way forward for monetary policy."
"US central bank's independence is critical to get inflation to 2%."
"Gradual rate hikes best way to make sure us central bank gets inflation back to 2%."

"Inflation has been too high, moving in wrong direction."
"Dollar remains word’s top reserve currency."
A stronger-than-usual bias towards monetary tightening stood out in Fed’s Hammack’s remarks: her FXS Speechtracker score reached 8.1/10 against an established baseline of 7.6/10. Her message was distinctly hawkish. While describing “gradual rate hikes” as “less disruptive”, she maintained that they remained necessary to bring policy into a “restrictive stance,”. Combined with her warning that inflation was “too high” and “moving in the wrong direction,” this points to a clear preference for further tightening over a pause.
Hammack’s comments also shifted the broader Fed tone further towards hawkishness, with the FXS Fed Sentiment Index climbing 1.05 points to 145.23. Remaining well above the neutral 100 level, the index indicates that her speech is consistent with a policy path favouring further rate increases and a prolonged restrictive stance. That assessment also accords with the elevated FXS Speechtracker score.
Responsibility for US monetary policy rests with the Federal Reserve (Fed), whose dual mandate is to maintain price stability and promote full employment. Interest-rate adjustments are its main means of meeting these objectives. If prices increase too rapidly and inflation exceeds the Fed’s 2% target, the central bank raises rates, pushing up borrowing costs across the economy. The US then becomes a more attractive destination for international investors’ funds, strengthening the US Dollar (USD). Conversely, the Fed may cut rates to stimulate borrowing when inflation drops below 2% or the unemployment rate is too high. Such a move puts pressure on the Greenback.
At the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) eight policy meetings each year, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) reviews economic conditions and decides on monetary policy. Twelve Fed officials participate in the FOMC: all seven Board of Governors members, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and four of the other eleven regional Reserve Bank presidents. Those four presidents rotate through one-year terms.
When conditions become extreme, the Federal Reserve may turn to Quantitative Easing (QE), a policy that substantially expands the flow of credit through a stalled financial system. As an unconventional policy tool, QE is deployed during crises or periods of exceptionally low inflation. The Fed favoured this approach during the Great Financial Crisis in 2008. Under QE, it prints additional Dollars to purchase high-grade bonds from financial institutions, a process that generally weakens the US Dollar.
Reversing QE, quantitative tightening (QT) involves the Federal Reserve halting bond purchases from financial institutions. It also refrains from using principal repaid on maturing bonds in its portfolio to buy new bonds. This process generally supports the value of the US Dollar.